 |  |  |  |
School board members take issue with board president; officer terms
shortened
The Riverton School Board met Dec. 14 at 6 p.m. in at the elementary school cafeteria; there were approximately 30 students, parents and teachers in the audience. A truth
in taxation hearing was held immediately following the roll call, and it was open to anyone for comment. There were no comments on the district’s proposed FY10 tax levy.
The board moved on to consider the minutes from the Nov. 9 regular and closed session meetings, and treasurer’s, revenue and expenditure reports. These were all
approved 7-0. Under “Payment of Bills,” a question was voiced regarding how scorekeepers, announcers and people who run the clock are paid. Supt. Mulligan replied that
regular season games are paid out of the district account, but tournament games are paid out of the activity account. There are not any cash payments, but Mulligan will
check into the accounting reports; he and Nancy Galligan briefly discussed this. The superintendent was also asked about a larger packet of bills, which contained Chase
card payments for travel. Supt. Mulligan stated those are generally for hotel stays related to staff development.
Editor’s Note: The following discussion, a follow-up to last month’s detailed discussion about the Madrigal/girls basketball shootout, is more detailed than it might ordinarily
be, since last month’s report was similarly detailed. It was decided, in the sense of fairness, that this meeting be covered in the same fashion.
At 6:07 p.m., they moved to the “Communications” part of the agenda. Ms. Julie Klebe addressed the board regarding the questioning Board President Paul Nonneman had
directed at Ms. Jill Stephenitch, high school choral teacher, during the November school board meeting. She thanked Dr. Mulligan and the high school building staff who
contributed to the success of the Madrigal dinner and performance; everyone in attendance thoroughly enjoyed it. She briefly recapped her reason for coming to the board in
September, restating that she had spoken then on behalf of many parents. Mrs. Klebe then addressed Mr. Nonneman regarding his behavior toward Ms. Stephenitch, and
referred to the district’s mission and vision standards that had been violated during the November meeting. She feels that Mr. Nonneman abused his power as president
and asked board members to put themselves in the place of a teacher who appears at a board meeting, by request, only to be subjected to a line of questioning that no one
could have predicted, but yet is allowed to persist.
Mrs. Klebe continued, “Put yourself in Ms. Stephenitch’s place when board members and administrators approach her sometime after the meeting to say that they had no
idea why that happened, were sorry and were so much in shock they didn’t know what to do. As a teacher, you might find a little comfort in the fact that no action was taken to
stop it because they were all in a state of shock, but you wonder what your place is in the district, having been subjected to the board president’s unprofessionalism. Parents
and students are here tonight to ask the board to make the right choice and let Mr. Nonneman know they no longer have confidence in his actions and are tired of how he
takes matters into his own hands and is oblivious to what his duties are as board president. Imagine how wonderful it would feel to see the board do the right thing. But,
what if you are a teacher or a parent or a staff member attending this meeting tonight and see the board back down and give Mr. Nonneman a mere slap on the wrist for
blatantly bullying a teacher. How would a teacher feel about being supported by the district if that happened? I understand it is a very difficult thing to do, telling a board
member his actions do not represent the board as a whole. However, it is more difficult for anyone to understand how anyone could consider Mr. Nonneman’s actions just a
‘mistake.’ How would you be able to explain to parents, students and other staff members when quality staff begin to look elsewhere for employment and leave this district,
because of the decisions which may be made tonight? I thank you for the opportunity to speak.”
Mrs. Sherri Zara was next. “Before I get started on what I have to say, I would like to read to you what Ms. Stephenitch published in the Madrigal program: ‘I really just want
you each to know that while I have struggled a bit in the last month to understand my purpose at school, every day you have brought a smile to my face and a song in my
heart. Thank you for being students like that, who inspire me in many ways.’ This is why we are all here tonight, because of how she is feeling. It’s my opinion, along with
many others, that Board President Paul Nonneman used his title to not only interrogate a staff member to the point that she left in tears, but to embarrass our school district
and other board members. It has been said that Mr. Nonneman was out of control and made a mistake, and didn’t mean to do what he did; I beg to differ with that. Paul
Nonneman came to that meeting fully prepared with notes that he used to interrogate and intimidate Ms. Stephenitch. This was all for what, his own personal gain and
because he can? Or is it because he has a vested interest in the basketball tournament? Why did he not use the same line of questioning with Mr. Koger and Mr. Jesberg
that he did with Ms. Stephenitch? I think it is time that the board takes control and show Mr. Nonneman that Riverton will not tolerate the type of unprofessional behavior that
he displayed that night. Ms. Stephenitch is not only a wonderful and talented educator, she is one of the kindest, sweetest persons I know. For many students in our school
district, both past and present, Ms. Stephenitch was able to get them to dig deep and find things within themselves that they did not know they had. Last year she took a
student who had never been involved with music and not only did he get involved, but he was one of the leads in last year’s musical and a valuable member of the RHS vocal
group. He is now going on to school for music.
“Riverton has always been known as a basketball town. I am here to tell you that has changed; we have one of the best fine arts facilities around, and along with that we
have a top-notch choral director. Since Jill came to our school she, along with three other great directors, have made a name for our productions and choral department. Ms.
Stephenitch is taking two of our students to the IMEA all-state choral and jazz. When was the last time we even had one student go, let alone two? With her, this is just the
beginning. Many of you know my daughter Zoey’s passion for music and performing. The other night, her father asked her why she wanted to study music education. Her
response to him was ‘If I could do for one student what Ms. Stephenitch has done for me, I know it would all be worth it.’ I think that says it all. What more can we as parents,
and you as board members, want for our children? I ask all of you to please find it in yourself to do the right thing and show Ms. Stephenitch that you support her and what
she has accomplished. Let Mr. Nonneman know you no longer have confidence in him in his role as a board president and board member. Thank you.”
Mr. Dave Buck, another parent, waived his time to speak.
Mr. Nonneman directed Supt. Mulligan to send a letter to Mrs. Racette, retiring high school English teacher, thanking her for not only doing her job for so long and so well,
but for entertaining the community in her role as directing school dramas and plays. Mr. Nonneman also directed Supt. Mulligan to send letters of congratulations to both
Bret Thixton and Ashley Cantrall, recipients of the SAR and DAR awards, respectively.
Mrs. Debbie Moore, board member, spoke regarding President Nonneman’s treatment of Ms. Stephenitch, stating it was rude, to say the least, and that she supports a
graded class over a sporting event. “We are here to educate our students. I feel that some of the items that have come before the board are because they have not been
handled appropriately at the lower levels, and I am requesting administration to step up and handle these things instead of allowing them to get to the point it did. It seemed
to have a simple solution, yet we failed to embrace it.”
Mrs. Kim Baskett, board member, thanked people in the audience for attending. “I appreciate the fact that all of you showed up in support of Ms. Stephenitch. I want to
address the issue from my point of sitting in shock last month and the fact that I was very offended with how Mr. Nonneman chose to address Ms. Stephenitch. It has caused
a lot of drama and I want to state in open session my lack of confidence in Mr. Nonneman as board president. We do not have a specific policy in place now to deal with this
and most policies come about as a result of something like this, which no one could have imagined would ever happen. I wanted my thoughts known publicly.”
Mrs. Baskett continued “During a special board meeting in May 2009, in closed session, which dealt with student disciplinary issues, Mr. Nonneman openly displayed his
hostility toward another board member who did not share his opinion. Upon coming out of closed session, Mr. Nonneman publicly stated his rationale for voting the way that
he did. When Mr. Nonneman read his scripted speech, prepared ahead of time, it came across that he was speaking for the entire board. While he is entitled to his own
opinion, it should not have implied he spoke for the rest of the board. Also, during the high school graduation ceremonies, Mr. Nonneman gave a congratulatory statement to
one of the students involved in the disciplinary issue. That was the only congratulatory statement he gave to any student during the ceremony. Various community members
of that audience felt his conduct was inappropriate and voiced this to board members, including myself, because they were very concerned about it. Also, earlier this fall,
during open session at one of the board meetings, Mr. Nonneman displayed open hostility toward another member. Whether or not hostility is shown during open or closed
session, it was not conduct of a respectful manner, and that is not something we should stand for. At the regular board meeting last month, Mr. Nonneman, acting as board
president, implemented an unprecedented limit to other board members’ discussion and line of questions when speaking with Mr. Jeff Koger, Mr. Jeff Jesberg and Ms. Jill
Stephenitch, who all three had been invited to the meeting. It was my suggestion that they be invited because of questions surrounding the Madrigal performance and girls’
basketball tournament, held at the high school during the same weekend. During open and flexible conversation, it was determined that these events could coincide
successfully. However, Mr. Nonneman established the order of board member questioning, scheduling himself to go last and prevented any other board members from
asking any follow-up questions because we’d already had ‘our turn.’ The events being able to coincide had been resolved before Mr. Nonneman spoke, but he chose to
establish that Riverton has one of the best high school gymnasiums in the area and, utilizing pre-written notes, began a direct questioning of Ms. Stephenitch. His conduct
was needlessly interrogating and hostile, so much so that she was visibly upset during his entire line of questioning, and left the building in tears. Fellow board members
were stunned as well. I personally wanted to, and I did apologize to her, that I did not stop it. I was unaware at that time that any board member could have stopped Mr.
Nonneman. I mistakenly thought that Supt. Mulligan would put a stop to it, but learned at the state school board convention that is not the superintendent’s right and that any
board member could have halted the questioning. I know that several people in the community were upset with this. During Mr. Nonneman’s attack, not only did he express
his displeasure that the matter had been brought before the board in the first place but he also publicly insulted a fellow board member. Mr. Nonneman showed his
disrespect for the process that allows anyone in the community to address the board; it is anybody’s right. For those reasons, I no longer have confidence in Mr. Nonneman.
I wanted all of you to know that the board takes your concerns seriously and we are doing our best to address those, even it is not resolved satisfactorily this evening.”
Mr. Mike Klebe, board member, said he had searched through the board policy manual and Roberts Rules of Order and found nothing regarding time limitations. He noted
the oath states, “I shall encourage and respect fellow board members, and those who come before the board, . . . honoring differences of opinions or perspective.” “I didn’t
find anything to support Mr. Nonneman’s establishing those time limitations, and as such, I feel that you abused your power and have definitely altered the relationship
between board members and board president. That trust between us has been violated, and it leads me to not have confidence in your ability. And as it relates to Ms.
Stephenitch, I was appalled by your conduct. She’s a third year teacher and has little experience in these matters, but she has really revitalized the music program at the high
school. Participation have doubled, if not more so, in the time she’s been here. She gets kids involved, and that’s what all parents want from our students. I tried to
understand, Paul, why you did this to Ms. Stephenitch, since things had been worked out with regard to the Madrigals and basketball during that meeting, so I wrote down
some questions. I don’t expect that you will answer them, because some are rhetorical, but here they are: Did you feel that the basketball program was under attack from the
fine arts program? Did you feel like you had to come to the athletic program’s defense? Do you just not like the fine arts program? As Mrs. Baskett mentioned, you showed
open hostility toward another board member. Well, I’m usually the recipient of some of that. Is it me? Do you not like me? Did you take that dislike for me out on Ms.
Stephenitch? I’m trying to understand all of this, but I got to thinking it really doesn’t matter because, as was stated before, you came to last month’s meeting with your list of
questions with the obvious intent of putting Ms. Stephenitch in that awkward position where she felt under attack, and now she wonders whether she has any value in the
district. And the students who are in attendance at tonight’s meeting are showing their support of a wonderful teacher. In my opinion, Paul, you have demonstrated a
profound lapse of judgment that has damaged the school board.”
Administrative team reports were next reviewed. Mrs. Binegar advised the board that Mrs. Becker wanted her to mention the mural at the elementary school, drawn by
students. It does look very nice, board members agreed. Mr. Nonneman asked Mrs. Binegar how much longer, if she “could look into the future” students would use
textbooks in education, in contrast to electronic learning. “That day is coming” Mrs. Binegar replied.
Mrs. Fraase, currently on maternity leave, will be working two days/week in January and back full time in February.
Mr. Fred Lamkey, middle school principal, was asked by Mr. McClure what grade levels are allowed to participate in the literacy contest? Lamkey replied in the past it’s been
allowed starting at the fifth and sixth grade levels on up; Ms. Rogers, a teacher at the high school, was the coordinator this year. McClure also asked whether the school
would be purchasing Amazon Kindle readers or Sony readers. Lamkey responded they could do that, and Mrs. Binegar offered to provide grant information to him for that
purpose.
Mr. Bill Lamkey, high school principal, stated in his report that the dual credit psychology class at LLCC for high school students is in limbo because LLCC lost that
instructor. They are looking for another instructor to do this. Lamkey also reported that the high school’s home economics classes may be cut by 50 percent and the
industrial technology program dropped altogether. He would like some direction from the board on this. There was discussion on money tied up in IT equipment that is not
being used. Mr. Klebe asked if Riverton teaches any classes with skills, such as putting in a light switch or using repair tools, or balancing a checkbook? Lamkey said
topics like that are touched upon throughout classes now. There was also discussion on the Skyward program, and grading scales used by other county schools. Mrs.
Cuffle inquired about senior class and intersession trips. Since the latter is so expensive, would it be possible to add a grading component to it, even a .25 credit? Lamkey
responded he would get information and bring it to the next meeting.
Mr. McClure reported he brought back information on the topics of the first amendment and a particular Wisconsin conservatory school’s program from the state conference.
Mr. Gum, assistant principal, said Ms. Stephenitch wanted them to know she was grateful for help provided during Madrigals. He talked about the Algebra I program, stating
there are students who aren’t going to make it. They have used on a trial basis a computer program that allows student to progress at their own pace, but it’s based on daily
labs that students must understand before continuing. Mr. Gum believes it could be utilized well; it’s an online program. Lamkey said it’s something they need to try. Mrs.
Baskett said she’s gone online to look at the program, and believes it’s worthwhile. There is grant money available. Mrs. Cuffle asked about the math program review; Supt.
Mulligan replied that’s a big push and it will occur after the winter break.
Mr. Patterson said he was amazed at the percentage of boys with Ds and Fs. Why is that? There are a multitude of factors, Mr. Gum replied. Mr. Nonneman asked about the
gender achievement gap and student suspension list. Achievement and discipline seem to go hand in hand, he noted. Supt. Mulligan said “PBIS will tell you there’s a huge
correlation.”
Mr. Patterson stated he is proud of the high school pom squad and also thinks Chris Bertolino is going to be a good coach. “He is really fired up,” per Patterson. Mr.
McClure asked that coaches be instructed not to tell students that “if you attend our clinic, you should have no problems making the team.” Some students didn’t make the
team in different buildings, so coaches shouldn’t mention it. Administrators agreed.
Mrs. Cuffle asked that a light be placed in the south parking lot at the high school so that people can see where the drain is; one person fell during the Early Bird Review
tournament. Supt. Mulligan said that would be addressed.
Mr. Koerwitz, transportation director, said needy students in the district had hats, shoes and gloves purchased for them. Attendance at middle school parent meetings
averages six. Mr. Wagahoff, activities and athletics director, was at a game, but his report noted 20 wrestlers out at the middle school, and others at the high school.
Mr. Geiger, grounds director, was asked about temperature consistency in the high school. He replied “there were people out today to check it. Construction and ductwork
over the years has created some of the problems, because the ductwork is too long.” Mr. Lamkey said he’s asked staff to let him know about variations. QZAB bonds
should help address this, Supt. Mulligan noted.
Supt. Mulligan also informed the board that the agreement with ISBE to follow the “Race to the Top” rules and regulations were literally just received. It’s a federal program,
and there is a Web presentation this Friday. If the state receives any money from this program, Mulligan said, the district would have to have its union president, board
president and superintendent sign off and agree to abide by all the rules and regs. He will have more information after this Friday.
The potential withdrawal agreement between SASED and Chatham was distributed to the board for review. Mulligan noted that Chatham waives any and all interest in
property owned by SASED; Chatham has agreed to transfer all staff, which is very important; Chatham will also require teachers retiring before a certain date to give notice,
because TRS penalties come into play; Chatham will pay for 13 seats at SASED central, paying 110 percent of cost, since they’re pulling out; Mulligan estimates $10,000 to
Riverton’s bill with SASED if Chatham does pull out. This is much less expensive than it could have been. If each local board approves agreement, it won’t go to the regional
level.
There will be a coaches’ meeting during the break. Supt. Mulligan said he’s taken the board’s feedback on this.
There will be a special policy committee meeting on January 6 at 5:30 p.m.
Nancy Galligan, board secretary, provided an update on the district’s food service. She enjoys working with the cooks and Aramark on menu and food selections. Certain
new items are going over well with students at schools; sugar is begin substantially cut at breakfasts. Soups and chilis were added for winter and she feels its moving in the
right direction. Mr. Klebe asked if the district would be able to do food in-house as opposed to contracting it out in the future? Galligan replied she’s “not sure if we’re there
yet” but feels district control of foods and program is huge. Supt. Mulligan believes the district is directing Aramark to do what is needed. Mrs. Cuffle asked if Galligan had
asked students their opinions? She said they are free to contact her with issues or suggestions.
Mrs. Cuffle also inquired how the district calendar drafts originate? It’s not given to board members for review ahead of asking them to approve it. Supt. Mulligan responded
it’s usually approved by the board in December of every year because parents want to know when they can take their vacations. Cuffle said parents have approached her
saying the district’s Christmas break is too long. Can a week be taken out and added to the summer? Mulligan replied he’s talked to administrators about the intersession
break during the winter; it has a certain percentage of students who attend. Cuffle has looked at nine other schools’ calendars; why couldn’t we start Aug. 3 and go to school
until Dec. 22, for instance? Mulligan doesn’t believe teachers will want to do that. He’s not opposed to postponing the vote tonight; it could be taken back to teachers for
discussion.
Mr. Patterson said he hears from parents about the district being in session past the month of May. Bill Lamkey was asked about high school graduation dates. Mr. Klebe
asked “How effective are intersessions now at helping students learn?” Mulligan and Mrs. Binegar said they’re used as interventions and have improved students’ gains.
Fred Lamkey thinks they’ve always been successful teaching skills students didn’t catch the first time. Bill Lamkey said students attend intersession at the high school for
grade improvement; students who need to make work up. Mr. Klebe responded he believes intersession should not be relied upon for that purpose; students need to be
working all nine weeks of each quarter. Supt. Mulligan mentioned looming finances with regard to keeping a teacher for intervention purposes or keeping the intersessions.
Mrs. Moore asked who sets the curriculum for intersessions? She was disappointed with her son’s experience. Giving a student a packet of papers to do doesn’t get a
student excited to learn.
Supt. Mulligan asked the board if they wanted to wait on the calendar until the next meeting? The teacher vote hasn’t actually occurred, and they could review it again with
different dates. The majority of the board decided to go ahead and leave it, and maybe look at changes for 2011-2012. The 2010-2011 school calendar was approved 6-1,
with Klebe voting no. The first day of school will be July 27, a Tuesday.
Supt. Mulligan mentioned the self-evaluation as part of the IASB and recommends they move forward with that. It is also part of the Baldrige criteria. The cost is $400. This
was approved 7-0.
“Approval of Board Officer’s Policy” was next. This included information received from the district’s attorney with regard to a school board officer’s conduct. Authority to
remove a school board member was discussed with regard to the state statute. Helen Tolan was noted as having authority to do that. Board members also discussed
changing the officer term limit policy from two years to one year. This will go into effect when the board is ready to vote on officers again, because the attorney’s opinion was it
couldn’t apply to officers already elected under the old policy. Mrs. Cuffle made the motion to amend the policy from two years to one when electing the president, vice
president and board secretary. Mr. Nonneman thinks they should wait until after next election. Mrs. Baskett asked for the attorney to consider a rules of conduct agreement
that each board member must sign, which would allow recourse. Mr. McClure believes they are all elected to be good stewards and represent the community and education
of district students; the only drawback to going from a two to a one year term for officers is that it may take someone a year to get up to speed, and then they’d be electing new
officers again. Other board members stated they would likely never consider voting a newly elected person to an officer’s position anyway, so experience shouldn’t be an
issue.
Mrs. Moore stated she’s for the one-year officer term, but feels that talking to the attorney for the purpose of the majority of board opinion that an officer should be removed,
then there needs to be a follow up meeting in January. Attorney could be present at that meeting, Mulligan stated. Mrs. Cuffle read from the attorney’s letter provided to board
members, saying the board could recommend a censure of a board member. The consensus is they would like the attorney to be part of the process. The board approved
reducing the officers term of service from two to one year by a vote of 5-2, with Nonneman and Patterson “no.”
They went into closed session at 8:44 p.m. and returned to open at 9:30 p.m. They approved the hiring of Ashley Valenti as kindergarten teacher and moving Steve Hindert
from fourth grade to PE teacher, by a vote of 7-0. Mr. McClure also advised that part of the state conference talked about a school board’s right to keep teachers from striking,
and this will be considered by the state legislature. Mrs. Moore asked Supt. Mulligan about receiving board information via e-mail. Mulligan said he can do that. Mr. Klebe
asked that the district’s Web site be brought up to date in terms of current board member listing, up-to-date meeting minutes and agenda/rationales, etc. The meeting was
adjourned at 9:38 p.m.
shortened
The Riverton School Board met Dec. 14 at 6 p.m. in at the elementary school cafeteria; there were approximately 30 students, parents and teachers in the audience. A truth
in taxation hearing was held immediately following the roll call, and it was open to anyone for comment. There were no comments on the district’s proposed FY10 tax levy.
The board moved on to consider the minutes from the Nov. 9 regular and closed session meetings, and treasurer’s, revenue and expenditure reports. These were all
approved 7-0. Under “Payment of Bills,” a question was voiced regarding how scorekeepers, announcers and people who run the clock are paid. Supt. Mulligan replied that
regular season games are paid out of the district account, but tournament games are paid out of the activity account. There are not any cash payments, but Mulligan will
check into the accounting reports; he and Nancy Galligan briefly discussed this. The superintendent was also asked about a larger packet of bills, which contained Chase
card payments for travel. Supt. Mulligan stated those are generally for hotel stays related to staff development.
Editor’s Note: The following discussion, a follow-up to last month’s detailed discussion about the Madrigal/girls basketball shootout, is more detailed than it might ordinarily
be, since last month’s report was similarly detailed. It was decided, in the sense of fairness, that this meeting be covered in the same fashion.
At 6:07 p.m., they moved to the “Communications” part of the agenda. Ms. Julie Klebe addressed the board regarding the questioning Board President Paul Nonneman had
directed at Ms. Jill Stephenitch, high school choral teacher, during the November school board meeting. She thanked Dr. Mulligan and the high school building staff who
contributed to the success of the Madrigal dinner and performance; everyone in attendance thoroughly enjoyed it. She briefly recapped her reason for coming to the board in
September, restating that she had spoken then on behalf of many parents. Mrs. Klebe then addressed Mr. Nonneman regarding his behavior toward Ms. Stephenitch, and
referred to the district’s mission and vision standards that had been violated during the November meeting. She feels that Mr. Nonneman abused his power as president
and asked board members to put themselves in the place of a teacher who appears at a board meeting, by request, only to be subjected to a line of questioning that no one
could have predicted, but yet is allowed to persist.
Mrs. Klebe continued, “Put yourself in Ms. Stephenitch’s place when board members and administrators approach her sometime after the meeting to say that they had no
idea why that happened, were sorry and were so much in shock they didn’t know what to do. As a teacher, you might find a little comfort in the fact that no action was taken to
stop it because they were all in a state of shock, but you wonder what your place is in the district, having been subjected to the board president’s unprofessionalism. Parents
and students are here tonight to ask the board to make the right choice and let Mr. Nonneman know they no longer have confidence in his actions and are tired of how he
takes matters into his own hands and is oblivious to what his duties are as board president. Imagine how wonderful it would feel to see the board do the right thing. But,
what if you are a teacher or a parent or a staff member attending this meeting tonight and see the board back down and give Mr. Nonneman a mere slap on the wrist for
blatantly bullying a teacher. How would a teacher feel about being supported by the district if that happened? I understand it is a very difficult thing to do, telling a board
member his actions do not represent the board as a whole. However, it is more difficult for anyone to understand how anyone could consider Mr. Nonneman’s actions just a
‘mistake.’ How would you be able to explain to parents, students and other staff members when quality staff begin to look elsewhere for employment and leave this district,
because of the decisions which may be made tonight? I thank you for the opportunity to speak.”
Mrs. Sherri Zara was next. “Before I get started on what I have to say, I would like to read to you what Ms. Stephenitch published in the Madrigal program: ‘I really just want
you each to know that while I have struggled a bit in the last month to understand my purpose at school, every day you have brought a smile to my face and a song in my
heart. Thank you for being students like that, who inspire me in many ways.’ This is why we are all here tonight, because of how she is feeling. It’s my opinion, along with
many others, that Board President Paul Nonneman used his title to not only interrogate a staff member to the point that she left in tears, but to embarrass our school district
and other board members. It has been said that Mr. Nonneman was out of control and made a mistake, and didn’t mean to do what he did; I beg to differ with that. Paul
Nonneman came to that meeting fully prepared with notes that he used to interrogate and intimidate Ms. Stephenitch. This was all for what, his own personal gain and
because he can? Or is it because he has a vested interest in the basketball tournament? Why did he not use the same line of questioning with Mr. Koger and Mr. Jesberg
that he did with Ms. Stephenitch? I think it is time that the board takes control and show Mr. Nonneman that Riverton will not tolerate the type of unprofessional behavior that
he displayed that night. Ms. Stephenitch is not only a wonderful and talented educator, she is one of the kindest, sweetest persons I know. For many students in our school
district, both past and present, Ms. Stephenitch was able to get them to dig deep and find things within themselves that they did not know they had. Last year she took a
student who had never been involved with music and not only did he get involved, but he was one of the leads in last year’s musical and a valuable member of the RHS vocal
group. He is now going on to school for music.
“Riverton has always been known as a basketball town. I am here to tell you that has changed; we have one of the best fine arts facilities around, and along with that we
have a top-notch choral director. Since Jill came to our school she, along with three other great directors, have made a name for our productions and choral department. Ms.
Stephenitch is taking two of our students to the IMEA all-state choral and jazz. When was the last time we even had one student go, let alone two? With her, this is just the
beginning. Many of you know my daughter Zoey’s passion for music and performing. The other night, her father asked her why she wanted to study music education. Her
response to him was ‘If I could do for one student what Ms. Stephenitch has done for me, I know it would all be worth it.’ I think that says it all. What more can we as parents,
and you as board members, want for our children? I ask all of you to please find it in yourself to do the right thing and show Ms. Stephenitch that you support her and what
she has accomplished. Let Mr. Nonneman know you no longer have confidence in him in his role as a board president and board member. Thank you.”
Mr. Dave Buck, another parent, waived his time to speak.
Mr. Nonneman directed Supt. Mulligan to send a letter to Mrs. Racette, retiring high school English teacher, thanking her for not only doing her job for so long and so well,
but for entertaining the community in her role as directing school dramas and plays. Mr. Nonneman also directed Supt. Mulligan to send letters of congratulations to both
Bret Thixton and Ashley Cantrall, recipients of the SAR and DAR awards, respectively.
Mrs. Debbie Moore, board member, spoke regarding President Nonneman’s treatment of Ms. Stephenitch, stating it was rude, to say the least, and that she supports a
graded class over a sporting event. “We are here to educate our students. I feel that some of the items that have come before the board are because they have not been
handled appropriately at the lower levels, and I am requesting administration to step up and handle these things instead of allowing them to get to the point it did. It seemed
to have a simple solution, yet we failed to embrace it.”
Mrs. Kim Baskett, board member, thanked people in the audience for attending. “I appreciate the fact that all of you showed up in support of Ms. Stephenitch. I want to
address the issue from my point of sitting in shock last month and the fact that I was very offended with how Mr. Nonneman chose to address Ms. Stephenitch. It has caused
a lot of drama and I want to state in open session my lack of confidence in Mr. Nonneman as board president. We do not have a specific policy in place now to deal with this
and most policies come about as a result of something like this, which no one could have imagined would ever happen. I wanted my thoughts known publicly.”
Mrs. Baskett continued “During a special board meeting in May 2009, in closed session, which dealt with student disciplinary issues, Mr. Nonneman openly displayed his
hostility toward another board member who did not share his opinion. Upon coming out of closed session, Mr. Nonneman publicly stated his rationale for voting the way that
he did. When Mr. Nonneman read his scripted speech, prepared ahead of time, it came across that he was speaking for the entire board. While he is entitled to his own
opinion, it should not have implied he spoke for the rest of the board. Also, during the high school graduation ceremonies, Mr. Nonneman gave a congratulatory statement to
one of the students involved in the disciplinary issue. That was the only congratulatory statement he gave to any student during the ceremony. Various community members
of that audience felt his conduct was inappropriate and voiced this to board members, including myself, because they were very concerned about it. Also, earlier this fall,
during open session at one of the board meetings, Mr. Nonneman displayed open hostility toward another member. Whether or not hostility is shown during open or closed
session, it was not conduct of a respectful manner, and that is not something we should stand for. At the regular board meeting last month, Mr. Nonneman, acting as board
president, implemented an unprecedented limit to other board members’ discussion and line of questions when speaking with Mr. Jeff Koger, Mr. Jeff Jesberg and Ms. Jill
Stephenitch, who all three had been invited to the meeting. It was my suggestion that they be invited because of questions surrounding the Madrigal performance and girls’
basketball tournament, held at the high school during the same weekend. During open and flexible conversation, it was determined that these events could coincide
successfully. However, Mr. Nonneman established the order of board member questioning, scheduling himself to go last and prevented any other board members from
asking any follow-up questions because we’d already had ‘our turn.’ The events being able to coincide had been resolved before Mr. Nonneman spoke, but he chose to
establish that Riverton has one of the best high school gymnasiums in the area and, utilizing pre-written notes, began a direct questioning of Ms. Stephenitch. His conduct
was needlessly interrogating and hostile, so much so that she was visibly upset during his entire line of questioning, and left the building in tears. Fellow board members
were stunned as well. I personally wanted to, and I did apologize to her, that I did not stop it. I was unaware at that time that any board member could have stopped Mr.
Nonneman. I mistakenly thought that Supt. Mulligan would put a stop to it, but learned at the state school board convention that is not the superintendent’s right and that any
board member could have halted the questioning. I know that several people in the community were upset with this. During Mr. Nonneman’s attack, not only did he express
his displeasure that the matter had been brought before the board in the first place but he also publicly insulted a fellow board member. Mr. Nonneman showed his
disrespect for the process that allows anyone in the community to address the board; it is anybody’s right. For those reasons, I no longer have confidence in Mr. Nonneman.
I wanted all of you to know that the board takes your concerns seriously and we are doing our best to address those, even it is not resolved satisfactorily this evening.”
Mr. Mike Klebe, board member, said he had searched through the board policy manual and Roberts Rules of Order and found nothing regarding time limitations. He noted
the oath states, “I shall encourage and respect fellow board members, and those who come before the board, . . . honoring differences of opinions or perspective.” “I didn’t
find anything to support Mr. Nonneman’s establishing those time limitations, and as such, I feel that you abused your power and have definitely altered the relationship
between board members and board president. That trust between us has been violated, and it leads me to not have confidence in your ability. And as it relates to Ms.
Stephenitch, I was appalled by your conduct. She’s a third year teacher and has little experience in these matters, but she has really revitalized the music program at the high
school. Participation have doubled, if not more so, in the time she’s been here. She gets kids involved, and that’s what all parents want from our students. I tried to
understand, Paul, why you did this to Ms. Stephenitch, since things had been worked out with regard to the Madrigals and basketball during that meeting, so I wrote down
some questions. I don’t expect that you will answer them, because some are rhetorical, but here they are: Did you feel that the basketball program was under attack from the
fine arts program? Did you feel like you had to come to the athletic program’s defense? Do you just not like the fine arts program? As Mrs. Baskett mentioned, you showed
open hostility toward another board member. Well, I’m usually the recipient of some of that. Is it me? Do you not like me? Did you take that dislike for me out on Ms.
Stephenitch? I’m trying to understand all of this, but I got to thinking it really doesn’t matter because, as was stated before, you came to last month’s meeting with your list of
questions with the obvious intent of putting Ms. Stephenitch in that awkward position where she felt under attack, and now she wonders whether she has any value in the
district. And the students who are in attendance at tonight’s meeting are showing their support of a wonderful teacher. In my opinion, Paul, you have demonstrated a
profound lapse of judgment that has damaged the school board.”
Administrative team reports were next reviewed. Mrs. Binegar advised the board that Mrs. Becker wanted her to mention the mural at the elementary school, drawn by
students. It does look very nice, board members agreed. Mr. Nonneman asked Mrs. Binegar how much longer, if she “could look into the future” students would use
textbooks in education, in contrast to electronic learning. “That day is coming” Mrs. Binegar replied.
Mrs. Fraase, currently on maternity leave, will be working two days/week in January and back full time in February.
Mr. Fred Lamkey, middle school principal, was asked by Mr. McClure what grade levels are allowed to participate in the literacy contest? Lamkey replied in the past it’s been
allowed starting at the fifth and sixth grade levels on up; Ms. Rogers, a teacher at the high school, was the coordinator this year. McClure also asked whether the school
would be purchasing Amazon Kindle readers or Sony readers. Lamkey responded they could do that, and Mrs. Binegar offered to provide grant information to him for that
purpose.
Mr. Bill Lamkey, high school principal, stated in his report that the dual credit psychology class at LLCC for high school students is in limbo because LLCC lost that
instructor. They are looking for another instructor to do this. Lamkey also reported that the high school’s home economics classes may be cut by 50 percent and the
industrial technology program dropped altogether. He would like some direction from the board on this. There was discussion on money tied up in IT equipment that is not
being used. Mr. Klebe asked if Riverton teaches any classes with skills, such as putting in a light switch or using repair tools, or balancing a checkbook? Lamkey said
topics like that are touched upon throughout classes now. There was also discussion on the Skyward program, and grading scales used by other county schools. Mrs.
Cuffle inquired about senior class and intersession trips. Since the latter is so expensive, would it be possible to add a grading component to it, even a .25 credit? Lamkey
responded he would get information and bring it to the next meeting.
Mr. McClure reported he brought back information on the topics of the first amendment and a particular Wisconsin conservatory school’s program from the state conference.
Mr. Gum, assistant principal, said Ms. Stephenitch wanted them to know she was grateful for help provided during Madrigals. He talked about the Algebra I program, stating
there are students who aren’t going to make it. They have used on a trial basis a computer program that allows student to progress at their own pace, but it’s based on daily
labs that students must understand before continuing. Mr. Gum believes it could be utilized well; it’s an online program. Lamkey said it’s something they need to try. Mrs.
Baskett said she’s gone online to look at the program, and believes it’s worthwhile. There is grant money available. Mrs. Cuffle asked about the math program review; Supt.
Mulligan replied that’s a big push and it will occur after the winter break.
Mr. Patterson said he was amazed at the percentage of boys with Ds and Fs. Why is that? There are a multitude of factors, Mr. Gum replied. Mr. Nonneman asked about the
gender achievement gap and student suspension list. Achievement and discipline seem to go hand in hand, he noted. Supt. Mulligan said “PBIS will tell you there’s a huge
correlation.”
Mr. Patterson stated he is proud of the high school pom squad and also thinks Chris Bertolino is going to be a good coach. “He is really fired up,” per Patterson. Mr.
McClure asked that coaches be instructed not to tell students that “if you attend our clinic, you should have no problems making the team.” Some students didn’t make the
team in different buildings, so coaches shouldn’t mention it. Administrators agreed.
Mrs. Cuffle asked that a light be placed in the south parking lot at the high school so that people can see where the drain is; one person fell during the Early Bird Review
tournament. Supt. Mulligan said that would be addressed.
Mr. Koerwitz, transportation director, said needy students in the district had hats, shoes and gloves purchased for them. Attendance at middle school parent meetings
averages six. Mr. Wagahoff, activities and athletics director, was at a game, but his report noted 20 wrestlers out at the middle school, and others at the high school.
Mr. Geiger, grounds director, was asked about temperature consistency in the high school. He replied “there were people out today to check it. Construction and ductwork
over the years has created some of the problems, because the ductwork is too long.” Mr. Lamkey said he’s asked staff to let him know about variations. QZAB bonds
should help address this, Supt. Mulligan noted.
Supt. Mulligan also informed the board that the agreement with ISBE to follow the “Race to the Top” rules and regulations were literally just received. It’s a federal program,
and there is a Web presentation this Friday. If the state receives any money from this program, Mulligan said, the district would have to have its union president, board
president and superintendent sign off and agree to abide by all the rules and regs. He will have more information after this Friday.
The potential withdrawal agreement between SASED and Chatham was distributed to the board for review. Mulligan noted that Chatham waives any and all interest in
property owned by SASED; Chatham has agreed to transfer all staff, which is very important; Chatham will also require teachers retiring before a certain date to give notice,
because TRS penalties come into play; Chatham will pay for 13 seats at SASED central, paying 110 percent of cost, since they’re pulling out; Mulligan estimates $10,000 to
Riverton’s bill with SASED if Chatham does pull out. This is much less expensive than it could have been. If each local board approves agreement, it won’t go to the regional
level.
There will be a coaches’ meeting during the break. Supt. Mulligan said he’s taken the board’s feedback on this.
There will be a special policy committee meeting on January 6 at 5:30 p.m.
Nancy Galligan, board secretary, provided an update on the district’s food service. She enjoys working with the cooks and Aramark on menu and food selections. Certain
new items are going over well with students at schools; sugar is begin substantially cut at breakfasts. Soups and chilis were added for winter and she feels its moving in the
right direction. Mr. Klebe asked if the district would be able to do food in-house as opposed to contracting it out in the future? Galligan replied she’s “not sure if we’re there
yet” but feels district control of foods and program is huge. Supt. Mulligan believes the district is directing Aramark to do what is needed. Mrs. Cuffle asked if Galligan had
asked students their opinions? She said they are free to contact her with issues or suggestions.
Mrs. Cuffle also inquired how the district calendar drafts originate? It’s not given to board members for review ahead of asking them to approve it. Supt. Mulligan responded
it’s usually approved by the board in December of every year because parents want to know when they can take their vacations. Cuffle said parents have approached her
saying the district’s Christmas break is too long. Can a week be taken out and added to the summer? Mulligan replied he’s talked to administrators about the intersession
break during the winter; it has a certain percentage of students who attend. Cuffle has looked at nine other schools’ calendars; why couldn’t we start Aug. 3 and go to school
until Dec. 22, for instance? Mulligan doesn’t believe teachers will want to do that. He’s not opposed to postponing the vote tonight; it could be taken back to teachers for
discussion.
Mr. Patterson said he hears from parents about the district being in session past the month of May. Bill Lamkey was asked about high school graduation dates. Mr. Klebe
asked “How effective are intersessions now at helping students learn?” Mulligan and Mrs. Binegar said they’re used as interventions and have improved students’ gains.
Fred Lamkey thinks they’ve always been successful teaching skills students didn’t catch the first time. Bill Lamkey said students attend intersession at the high school for
grade improvement; students who need to make work up. Mr. Klebe responded he believes intersession should not be relied upon for that purpose; students need to be
working all nine weeks of each quarter. Supt. Mulligan mentioned looming finances with regard to keeping a teacher for intervention purposes or keeping the intersessions.
Mrs. Moore asked who sets the curriculum for intersessions? She was disappointed with her son’s experience. Giving a student a packet of papers to do doesn’t get a
student excited to learn.
Supt. Mulligan asked the board if they wanted to wait on the calendar until the next meeting? The teacher vote hasn’t actually occurred, and they could review it again with
different dates. The majority of the board decided to go ahead and leave it, and maybe look at changes for 2011-2012. The 2010-2011 school calendar was approved 6-1,
with Klebe voting no. The first day of school will be July 27, a Tuesday.
Supt. Mulligan mentioned the self-evaluation as part of the IASB and recommends they move forward with that. It is also part of the Baldrige criteria. The cost is $400. This
was approved 7-0.
“Approval of Board Officer’s Policy” was next. This included information received from the district’s attorney with regard to a school board officer’s conduct. Authority to
remove a school board member was discussed with regard to the state statute. Helen Tolan was noted as having authority to do that. Board members also discussed
changing the officer term limit policy from two years to one year. This will go into effect when the board is ready to vote on officers again, because the attorney’s opinion was it
couldn’t apply to officers already elected under the old policy. Mrs. Cuffle made the motion to amend the policy from two years to one when electing the president, vice
president and board secretary. Mr. Nonneman thinks they should wait until after next election. Mrs. Baskett asked for the attorney to consider a rules of conduct agreement
that each board member must sign, which would allow recourse. Mr. McClure believes they are all elected to be good stewards and represent the community and education
of district students; the only drawback to going from a two to a one year term for officers is that it may take someone a year to get up to speed, and then they’d be electing new
officers again. Other board members stated they would likely never consider voting a newly elected person to an officer’s position anyway, so experience shouldn’t be an
issue.
Mrs. Moore stated she’s for the one-year officer term, but feels that talking to the attorney for the purpose of the majority of board opinion that an officer should be removed,
then there needs to be a follow up meeting in January. Attorney could be present at that meeting, Mulligan stated. Mrs. Cuffle read from the attorney’s letter provided to board
members, saying the board could recommend a censure of a board member. The consensus is they would like the attorney to be part of the process. The board approved
reducing the officers term of service from two to one year by a vote of 5-2, with Nonneman and Patterson “no.”
They went into closed session at 8:44 p.m. and returned to open at 9:30 p.m. They approved the hiring of Ashley Valenti as kindergarten teacher and moving Steve Hindert
from fourth grade to PE teacher, by a vote of 7-0. Mr. McClure also advised that part of the state conference talked about a school board’s right to keep teachers from striking,
and this will be considered by the state legislature. Mrs. Moore asked Supt. Mulligan about receiving board information via e-mail. Mulligan said he can do that. Mr. Klebe
asked that the district’s Web site be brought up to date in terms of current board member listing, up-to-date meeting minutes and agenda/rationales, etc. The meeting was
adjourned at 9:38 p.m.
Issue Date: Dec. 17, 2009
